• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Indexing and Abstracting
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Botany
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 65 (2025)
Volume Volume 64 (2024)
Volume Volume 63 (2023)
Volume Volume 62 (2022)
Volume Volume 61 (2021)
Volume Volume 60 (2020)
Volume Volume 59 (2019)
Volume Volume 58 (2018)
Volume Volume 57 (2017)
Volume Volume 56 (2016)
Volume Volume 55 (2015)
Volume Volume 54 (2014)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
(2014). Allelopathic Potentiality of Heliotropium curassavicum L. and H.bacciferum Forssk.. Egyptian Journal of Botany, 54(2), 295-316. doi: 10.21608/ejbo.2014.493
. "Allelopathic Potentiality of Heliotropium curassavicum L. and H.bacciferum Forssk.". Egyptian Journal of Botany, 54, 2, 2014, 295-316. doi: 10.21608/ejbo.2014.493
(2014). 'Allelopathic Potentiality of Heliotropium curassavicum L. and H.bacciferum Forssk.', Egyptian Journal of Botany, 54(2), pp. 295-316. doi: 10.21608/ejbo.2014.493
Allelopathic Potentiality of Heliotropium curassavicum L. and H.bacciferum Forssk.. Egyptian Journal of Botany, 2014; 54(2): 295-316. doi: 10.21608/ejbo.2014.493

Allelopathic Potentiality of Heliotropium curassavicum L. and H.bacciferum Forssk.

Article 8, Volume 54, Issue 2, December 2014, Page 295-316  XML PDF (828.58 K)
Document Type: Regular issue (Original Article)
DOI: 10.21608/ejbo.2014.493
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Abstract
Aotropium curassavicum and H. bacciferum on the growth parameters of Calotropis procera and Faba sativa. Ground shoot powder with three application rates of 2.5, 5 and 10 g per 8 kg soil for the two Heliotropium species treatment referred as T1, T2 and T3; respectively, were evenly mulched on the soil surface of the test species. The present study showed that the inhibitory effect of H.curassavicum on the growth of the test species was generally more than that of H. bacciferum. Values of root-shoot (R:S) ratios for C.procera treated with either H. curassavicum or H. bacciferum mulches, were less than unity while the same measurements for F.sativa were more than unity. Less number of flowers per individual was recorded in the treated F. sativa in comparison to that of C.procera. Comparing dry matter allocation of C. procera plant organs in most growth stages and treatments demonstrated that, percent allocation of leaves > stem > root > flowers. Dry matter allocation to roots in the case of F. sativa plants treated with either H.curassavicum or H. bacciferum, gave maximum values as compared to other plant organs. Growth analysis of the two test species and the variation in growth criteria in response to the effect of mulching treatments included relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR), leaf area ratio (LAR), specific leaf area (SLA) and specific leaf weight (SLW) were studied. The RGRs of the two test species generally decreased as the plant age proceeded. The present study recommends the use of the two Heliotropium species for the biocontrol of harmful shrubs such as C. procera and at the same time alerts of the inhibitory effect of these species on the growth of economic plants such as F. sativa.

Keywords
Allelopathic potentiality; Heliotropium curassavicum; Heliotropium bacciferum; Dry matter allocation; growth parameters
Statistics
Article View: 381
PDF Download: 1,542
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.